SEO Consulting

The three pillars of classic SEO, under one roof

Technical SEO, On-page SEO, and Off-page SEO — accessibility, relevance, and authority. Three distinct services that combine into the foundation GEO and AEO are built on.

SEO consulting at AIRank means working directly with one specialist who diagnoses, prioritizes by impact, and builds the SEO strategy. I execute the content and authority work, and your team implements the technical and on-page recommendations that make a site visible, in search engines and in AI-generated answers. It covers the three classic SEO pillars (technical, on-page, off-page) as the foundation GEO and AEO are built on.

Technical SEO →

The plumbing without which nothing else matters

On-page SEO →

What each page says, who it speaks to, and how it connects to the rest of the site. Technical work makes you…

Off-page SEO →

Your entity authority

Want details on Schema Markup specifically? See the dedicated Schema.org page — what it is, types, validation, common mistakes.

What an SEO consultant does

An SEO consultant goes into your code, your analytics, and your content, and shows you, with evidence from your own site, what's blocking visibility. Not a generic best-practices list, real problems, found and prioritized.

At AIRank, the work follows the three classic pillars. Technical SEO handles access: crawling, indexing, rendering, schema, speed. On-page SEO handles relevance: what each page says and who it speaks to. Off-page SEO handles authority: what everyone else says about you.

In practice, a consultant delivers an audit prioritized by impact, a step-by-step plan with recommendations for your development team, and periodic monitoring, so you can see what actually changed. Without reporting, any SEO work is a guess.

Consultant vs. agency vs. in-house hire

Three options, with different trade-offs, not one universal answer.

An agency gives you more hands on the account, but usually also an account manager standing between you and the person doing the technical work, plus overhead you pay regardless of how simple the project is. An in-house hire is fully dedicated to you, but costs a full salary year-round, and senior technical SEO, the kind that fixes crawl problems at scale, is hard to hire and expensive to keep.

An independent consultant sits in between: direct access to whoever does the work, not whoever relays it, without an agency's overhead, but with the clear limit of one person. AIRank isn't an agency with dozens of employees, it's a consultant with 12+ years in SEO, with technical SEO at enterprise scale, doing the work himself, from audit to content and off-page campaigns. The right choice depends on how complex your site is and how much control you want over technical decisions.

What deliverables you get

Every engagement starts with an audit prioritized by impact: what needs fixing urgently, what's medium priority, what's nice-to-have, with an explanation for every finding, not just a score. From there you get a step-by-step plan: I execute the content and off-page activity, and your developer implements the technical and on-page recommendations.

For retainer engagements, deliverables continue monthly: content (delivered as a file for approval, or as a draft in your site), off-page activity, prioritized technical and on-page recommendations, a check of the result once your team implements them, and reporting that shows explicitly what changed, not just raw numbers without context. Tracking your visibility in AI answers, citations and share of voice, is part of the retainer, not a separate add-on. Exact scope and price per tier are on the pricing page.

How this connects to GEO and AEO

Classic SEO doesn't compete with GEO and AEO, it supports them. Technical work answers whether a bot can access and understand the site. On-page answers whether the page is relevant to the question asked. Off-page answers whether you're a trustworthy source. Without all three, GEO (getting selected as a source) and AEO (getting cited at the passage level) have nothing to build on.

That's why any GEO/AEO engagement at AIRank starts with an audit of the classic foundation. Separate detail on each discipline: what GEO is and what AEO is. The differences between SEO, GEO, AEO and AIO are in the comparison, and every term is defined in the glossary.

Methodology

Our SEO consulting process

Prioritized audit

I go into your code, analytics, and content and show you, with concrete evidence, what's blocking visibility — prioritized by impact, not a generic best-practices list.

Plan and recommendations

You get a step-by-step plan for all three disciplines — technical, on-page, off-page. I execute the off-page activity; your development team implements the technical and on-page recommendations.

Monthly deliverables

For retainer engagements: on-page content written by me (delivered as a file or draft), off-page activity, and prioritized technical recommendations. Once your team implements them, I check the result.

Reporting & AI tracking

Explicit reporting on what changed, plus tracking your visibility in AI answers — citations and share of voice, part of the retainer.

Frequently asked questions

Direct answers to what clients ask most before starting an SEO consulting engagement.

SEO consulting means working directly with a specialist who diagnoses, prioritizes, and recommends the fixes that make a site visible, in search engines and in AI-generated answers. It differs from a standard agency package in that you work directly with the person doing the work, with no account manager in between. At AIRank it covers three classic disciplines, technical SEO, on-page SEO, and off-page SEO, as the foundation for GEO and AEO.

An agency usually staffs an account with several people, an account manager, a technical specialist, a copywriter, and the overhead reflects that. An independent consultant means one person with direct experience doing the audit, content and off-page campaigns with no intermediaries. The upside is direct access to technical decisions; the limit is one person's capacity. For very large sites with many parallel workstreams, an agency can make sense. For most small and mid-size sites, a senior consultant moves faster, with less overhead.

It depends on scope. An initial audit is a fixed cost, and ongoing work is billed as a monthly retainer with a clear set of deliverables: technical, on-page, off-page, and GEO/AEO visibility tracking. Exact prices and what each tier includes are on the pricing page, not repeated here so they don't go stale if the structure changes.

It depends on the discipline. Technical corrections, crawling, indexing, speed, can show effect within weeks, after your team implements them and Google and AI bots re-crawl the corrected pages. Off-page authority and parametric AI signals move slower, in months, not weeks, because AI models only update what they know at retraining. That's why monthly reporting explicitly separates what moved quickly from what's building over the long term.

Yes, but not as separate disciplines sold individually. GEO and AEO are built on the classic SEO foundation, technical, on-page, off-page, not in parallel with it. If you optimize only for AI-answer visibility without touching the technical foundation, you risk working on content bots can't even access correctly. AIRank treats all five disciplines as one system, even though each has its own page and deliverables.

Usually yes, as a supplement, not a replacement. An in-house marketing team typically covers content, campaigns, and branding, but enterprise-level technical SEO, crawl budget, JS rendering, schema at scale, is a separate specialty, hard to cover internally without a dedicated hire. An outside consultant steps in on a project or retainer basis, without duplicating your team's roles, filling exactly the technical diagnosis and recommendations your team doesn't cover.

An audit report prioritized by impact, a step-by-step plan, and for retainer engagements: content, off-page activity, monthly technical and on-page recommendations and a check of them after implementation, plus reporting that shows explicitly what changed. You don't get a generic document with universal recommendations. Every finding comes from analyzing your own site, with a clear priority for fixing it.

Your developer or your team. We write the content and deliver it as a file for approval, or as a draft in your site; you or your team publish it. We run the off-page campaigns. For technical and on-page work you get prioritized recommendations with clear instructions, which your developer implements. Once they do, we check the result (re-crawl, indexing, speed) and report what changed.

Not sure which one you need first?

Book a discovery call — I'll tell you what I see and what I recommend fixing first.

Book a discovery call → Free SEO GEO AEO audit WhatsApp

The three pillars of classic SEO, under one roof